Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

207

Commenting on behalf of

AH DESIGN INC

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Gents, It is my professional opinion as the consultant engineer and also as the erector of the girders that the new bracing requirement is not suitable for the NU beams. It seems the idea is originated from the steel girders and now implemented for the NU girders. Read more

Comment ID

208

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
From the point of view of a Structural Engineer, I support this proposal because bracing is necessary to mitigate risks of something happening on site, it can ensure the stability of girders in case they are hit by a backhoe, gust wind, rotation during a deck pour, especially erection over traffic. Read more

Comment ID

209

Commenting on behalf of

MTO Central Structural Section

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
1. drawing show wind pressure designed for is 395pa, how about area that has higher pressure? 2. any reason there has to be end bracing and intermediate bracing? How much safety factor is provided? 3. without bracing, how much is the safety factor? Is the bracing only designed for wind load? Read more

Comment ID

229

Commenting on behalf of

Ontario Road Builders' Association (ORBA)

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please see ORBA feedback (comments, questions, and recommendations) in regards to MTO TCP Notice. No. 000-0085 on: Minimum Bracing Requirements for NU Girders Installation. Supporting attachments where applicable are provided for information and reference. Read more