Comment
1350.08.01.01 General
- No technical justification has been provided for reducing the referee testing period from five days to three.
- Shortening the timeframe limits effective communication and coordination between the general contractor, placing contractor, and concrete supplier.
- The reduced window increases the likelihood of rushed decisions, errors, and disputes during the testing process.
- It may lead to higher project risk and increased costs due to constrained timelines for scheduling and completing referee testing.
- The original acceptance thresholds for confirming referee test results were developed based on a five-day testing period.
- Reducing the testing period by approximately 40% without adjusting confirmation criteria creates a misalignment in the acceptance framework.
- This makes it more difficult to confirm referee test results, potentially leading to more rejections or disputes.
- Overall, the shortened timeframe introduces unnecessary risk without demonstrating a corresponding benefit to quality or project outcomes.
Submitted March 24, 2026 4:53 PM
Comment on
NSP DB 1350 – Material Specification for Concrete – Materials and Production
TCP number
000-0288
Comment ID
553
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status