On page 7 of 9 under Section…

TCP number

000-0128

Comment ID

266

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses

Comment

On page 7 of 9 under Section "Construction" it says, "It is recommended that the Contract Administrator (CA) become the designated point of contact between the railway companies and MTO."

On age 2 of 9 under Section "Programming of Work - Identification of Flagging Needs" it says, "The Purchase Order shall be provided to the railway by the Contract Services Administrator (CSA)." Implying that the designated point of contact between the railway companies and MTO during construction is the CSA.

The statements are somewhat contradictory to each other. Wouldn't it be simpler to essentially state that the CA by default is the designated point of contact (at that stage), and in the absence of a CA it will be the CSA?