Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Search comments

Comment ID

406

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Does the Ministry really support a reluctance to provide full-time inspection? and what potential implications could that mean to the provision of safety to the public in general especially as this is dealing with structural components and we have seem catastrophic failures in other provinces? Read more

Comment ID

407

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses

On page 5 the document says that monotube fabricators are "pre-approved".  Are the fabricators pre-approved or pre-qualified?

Read more

Comment ID

409

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Regarding the requirements for structural coating, would the Ministry consider allowing a Professional Engineer who has experience with structural coating and who is registered in RAQS under the Structural Coating Specialty work in place of a Level 3 coating inspector? Read more

Comment ID

410

Commenting on behalf of

Association of Consulting Engineering Companies - Ontario

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
On behalf of the Association of Consulting Engineering Companies-Ontario (ACEC-Ontario), and its 140 member firms operating across the province, we are writing to provide the following comments on the Ministry of Transportation’s (MTO) Guidelines for the Procurement of Specialty Inspection Services Read more